Bigfoot Seen By Leif Erickson

In every civilization around the world there is a belief in a large humanoid creature that can be classified as Big foot. The most famous example of this relates to western civilization and the first reported in RECORDED history was made by Eric the Red of Iceland. (He was also known as Leif Erikson and believed to be the first European to visit the Americas long before Columbus). Erik reported seeing huge ape-like creatures that walked upright, that had a swarthy appearance.

Erik the Red has been speculated by historians and cultural anthropologists to have learned his Viking conquest method by studying Big foot. If you have no background with Vikings, they basically were a seafaring people who conquered coastal villages in a brutal manner. The Vikings watched Bigfoot’s mating habits and how violent they were when it came to getting what they wanted which Eric the Red incorporated in his conquering strategy of taking villages and sand paper banging the Women in those villages.

 Bigfoot Cast

Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, is an alleged ape-like creature said to inhabit remote forests, mainly in the Pacific northwest region of the United States and the Canadian province of British Columbia. In northern Wisconsin, Lakota Indians know the creature by the name Chiye-tanka, (WHICH IS NOT ALGONQUIN FOR THE GOOD LAND) a Lakota name for "Big Elder Brother FORNICATOR OF OUR SLEEPING WOMEN." Bigfoot is sometimes described as a large, hairy bipedal hominid, and some believe that this animal, or its close relatives, may be found around the world under different regional names, such as the Yeti of Tibet and Nepal, the Yeren of mainland China, and the Yowie of Australia. Scientists argue that Bigfoot is the missing link between man and ape. However, recent scholars have suggested that Bigfoot is the missing link between man and Guy Code. This has started a violent trend of evolution and creationism between those who believe God instructed Moses of Guy Code, but now the missing link maybe the key to fully understanding how Guy Code came to being.

 Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Evidence

The above image is from the Patterson-Gimlin film, a movie of a Bigfoot creature taken by Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin in 1967. Both men lived near Yakima, Washington State. Patterson had been involved in the search for the elusive Bigfoot or Sasquatch for many years and had written a book on the subject entitled Do Abominable Snowmen Of America Really Exist and do they Love Human Snatch? In this book, he calls attention to the significant amount of evidence that supports the creature's existence and lust for homo sapien Fly Trap. Gimlin, a highly experienced outdoorsman, was a close friend of Patterson and agreed to accompany him on a wilderness expedition to search for the creature.

Equipped with a 16mm hand-held Kodak movie camera, the two searchers set out on horseback in October, 1967 and explored the wilderness regions in northern California. They concentrated their search in the area near Bluff Creek which is in the Six Rivers National Forest. Bluff Creek itself is about 38 air miles south of the California/Oregon border and 18 air miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. This region was selected because Bigfoot footprints had been found there in prior years along with strange camp site Sex orgies. A road was constructed into Bluff Creek in 1957, opening the area, which up to that time had been remote wilderness. Road construction workers noticed large human-like footprints in the soft soil which were reported to the press by Jerry Crew in October, 1958. The word "Bigfoot" (big dick) was used in the press release and has now become a common name for the creature. Subsequent investigations at that time revealed tracks of six different sizes, indicating that a number of creatures frequented the area. Footprint sizes ranged from 12¼ inches to 17 inches long.

In the early afternoon of October 20, 1967 Patterson and Gimlin spotted a female Bigfoot down on the creek gravel sandbar. Patterson's horse reared in alarm at the sight of the creature, bringing both horse and rider to the ground, Patterson pinned below. Being an experienced horsecocksman, he quickly disengaged himself and grabbed his camera. While running toward the creature, Patterson took 24 feet of color film footage. During this time, the creature quickly but calmly walked away across the sandbar into the woods since Patterson was not a female. In the meantime, Gimlin observed the whole scene, rifle in hand, in case his friend was attacked by the creature's massive penis. The men had previously agreed that under no circumstances would they shoot a Bigfoot unless in self-protection. The creature, estimated to be 7 feet 3½ inches in height and weighing 700 pounds, left footprints 14½ inches long by 6 inches wide. In that part of Bluff Creek, there is a sandy clay soil with a blue-gray tinge. This type of soil holds footprints remarkably well for a long period of time.

 Bigfoot Video

click

Missing link and Bigfoot

 Bigfoot Is Big

Bigfoot is described as being between 7 and 10 feet (2.1 and 3 meters) tall, and covered in dark brown or dark reddish hair with a penis the size of a small Volks Wagon bug. The head seems to sit directly on the shoulders, with no apparent neck due to the over emphasis on staring at its own penis. Alleged witnesses have described large eyes, a pronounced brow ridge, and a large, low-set forehead; the top of the head has been described as rounded and crested, similar to the sagittal crest of the male gorilla only with a large genitalia.

 Massive Penis

The earliest unambiguous reports of gigantic apelike creatures in the Pacific Northwest date from 1924, after a series of alleged encounters at a location in Washington later dubbed Ape Canyon, as related in The Oregonian. Reports the pro-Bigfoot authors claim are similar appear in the mainstream press dating back at least to the 1860s. The phenomenon attained widespread notoriety in 1958 when enormous footprints were reported in Humboldt County, California by road workers; the tracks pictured in the media inspired the familiar name "Bigfoot." There were another set of foot prints much smaller between the larger ones. Researches believe it was instinctual Guy Code mating with a human female.

 Loves Human Female Snatch

Mainstream scientists generally dismiss the phenomena due to a lack of representative specimens. They attribute the numerous sightings to folklore, mythology, hoaxes, and the misidentification of common animals. Ecologist Robert Michael Pyle argues that most cultures have human-like giants in their folk history. "We have this need for some larger-than-life creature due to our lack in penis size and lusting women."

 Scientist Discount Evidence

Scientists and academics overwhelmingly "discount the existence of Bigfoot because the evidence supporting belief in the survival of a prehistoric, bipedal, apelike creature of such dimensions is scant". In addition to the lack of evidence, they cite the fact that while Bigfoot is alleged to live in regions unusual for a large, nonhuman primate, i.e., temperate latitudes in the northern hemisphere, all other recognized nonhuman apes are found in the tropics, Africa, continental Asia or nearby islands. The great apes have never been found in the fossil record in the Americas, and no Bigfoot bones or bodies have been found. But 100’s of camping women’s virginity have been lost in those regions. The virginity was lost very painfully, suddenly and very sweaty.

Bigfoot's Dick Stinks

Many scientists do not give the subject of Bigfoot's existence serious attention, given the history of dubious claims and outright hoaxes. Napier wrote that the mainstream scientific community's indifference stems primarily from "insufficient evidence it is hardly surprising that scientists prefer to investigate the probable rather than beat their heads against the wall of the faintly possible." Anthropologist David Daegling echoed this idea, citing a "remarkably limited amount of Sasquatch data that are amenable to scientific scrutiny and the actual existence of Ape instinctual Guy Code." He advises that mainstream skeptics take a proactive position "to offer an alternative explanation of random rural virginity deflowering could be attributed to another cause. Indeed, many scientists insist that the breeding population of such an animal would be so large that it would account for many more purported sightings than currently occur, making the existence of such an animal an almost certain impossibility. However, male Bigfoot prefer mating with human women as opposed to their own. This could explain the population.

 Rite Of Passage

On May 24, 2006 Maria Goodavage wrote an article in USA Today titled, "Bigfoot Merely Amuses Most Scientists Guy Code Envy", in which she quotes Washington State zoologist John Crane, "There is no such thing as Bigfoot Guy Code. No data other than material that's clearly been fabricated has ever been presented." Several other prominent scientists have also expressed at least a guarded interest in Sasquatch reports, including George Schaller, Russell Mittermeier, Daris Swindler and Esteban Sarmiento. These men have been ridiculed by Guy Code scholars as to have no clear understanding of the relationship between man and Guy Code.

Bigfoot Shit Is Environmentally Toxic

Prominent anthropologist Carleton S. Coon's posthumously published essay Why the Sasquatch Must Exist states, "Even before I read John Green's book Sasquatch: The Apes Among Us, first published in 1978, I accepted Sasquatch's existence." Coon examines the question from several angles, stating that he is confident only in ruling out a relict Neanderthal population as a viable candidate for Sasquatch reports and instinctual Guy Code. As previously noted, Napier generally argued against Bigfoot's existence, but added that some "soft evidence" (i.e., eyewitness accounts, footprints, hair, penis assaults and droppings) is compelling enough that he advises against "dismissing its reality out of hand."

Sasquatch Is Bigfoot

Krantz and others have argued that a double standard is applied to Sasquatch studies by many academics: whenever there is a claim or evidence of Sasquatch's existence, enormous scrutiny is applied, as well as it should be. Yet when individuals claim to have hoaxed Bigfoot evidence, the claims are frequently accepted without corroborative evidence. Scholars suggest this is done to protect the biblical origins of Guy Code. In other words, evolution vs. creation is even evident in comparing the relationship with Bigfoot and Guy Code.

Men Jealous Of Bigfoot

Most of the Bigfoot sightings occur in wilderness areas such as camping sites, wilderness, or national parks. Evan Tanner believes that Bigfoot does not choose to live in these locations as a natural habitat but rather a place of interest because of the tourist traffic of female hikers. Tanner has been criticized as being one of those black helicopter conspirators concerning his theory of Bigfoot but he contends that he is being ostracized by men whose girlfriends, wives, daughters, sisters etc, have had a sexual encounter with Bigfoot. Women love large penis and have a craving for curiosity towards it. According to Tanner, men with a weak sense of self worth do not believe in Bigfoot are just envious and bitterly jealous of Bigfoot’s penis size. However, most men would hate Bigfoot because he Waylaid the pure T snot out of their chick’s vagina, and in some cases their Corn hole. Big foot loves corn according to Tanner.